Luke Janssen

Jumping off stuff

Archive for October, 2008

Halloween? or sluts night out!

Halloween (extract from Wikipedia): “The ancient Gaels believed that on October 31, now known as Halloween, the boundary between the alive and the deceased dissolved, and the dead become dangerous for the living by causing problems such as sickness or damaged crops. The festivals would frequently involve bonfires, into which bones of slaughtered livestock were thrown. Costumes and masks were also worn at the festivals in an attempt to mimic the evil spirits or placate them.”

So what happens in New York? every single girl I speak to is dressing up as a slut. Most aren’t even doing “sexy witch” or “scantily clad vombie”, but are going straight for the “slutty nurse” or “slutty army officer” or my favourite “Slutty Slut”. 

That all said, all the slutty sluts do look pretty cool, and can loosely be defined as “evil spirits” so I don’t know what I am complaining about. I was thinking of just going as a “murderer”. Just in my normal clothes.

Android app vs iPhone app?

We just bought a G1 in New York to send to Sydney, but before that our man Johnny Makkar had a look at it. See what he wrote here, it was a pretty popular article linked to many others.

Lots of clients are asking about Android now, usually in the same context as iPhone apps. If you do one or the other do an iPhone app, but really the important thing is to design a good, useable application. Once you have done that an android app or iPhone app or mobile site are just ways to communicate that to people using different technologies.

We used to have to do this to an extent with the Java mobile apps that we made – making 20+ versions to deal with the idiosynchracies was not uncommon. Where people are going mad is they are discussing technologies wen they should be discussing the value that the content will provide on mobile. In this respect the more important questions are:

  • what content do you want to make available on mobile?
  • Why use mobile? why is it an appropriate medium (two examples are 1) because the content is needed on the move when you are not in front of your PC, or 2) because you need to get the content or information that second)
  • How will I make it as useable experience as possible. Design! think not just about the screen size, but the mindset of the user when they are interating. 

A note on the G1 phone. looks cool, but iPhone is still way prettier. A nicer piece of design trumps technology any day. Thats why the pink Motorola Razr sold so many – I can just imagine the engineers snigering at the marketing person’s suggestion that making it pink will sell more than some piece of functiaonlity. Well sucked in engineers!

Mom n Pop vs “big business”

I saw this article (read it here) about Hottix suing Beattie McGuinness Bungay (BMB). Apparently BMB asked Hottix to license their iBeer iPhone application, and Hottix said no, so they made their own iPint application and because it was free and the iBeer cost US$2.99, Hottix lost money.

So everyone who commented agreed with Hottix and were all “poor old Hottix, a mom n pop operation being raped by the big evil corporate”. But wait just a minute! I have to say I am on the side of BMB.

  • Firstly What IP? a pint emptying as the iPhone is tilted is hardly revolutionary IP! plus the iPint was different anyway.
  • Secondly, I find it disgraceful that iBeer is US$2.99. Hottix deserve something cheaper to come along because there is NO VALUE there. If IP means you can make stuff that is SHIT expensive, then sorry, but I don’t believe in IP.
  • Thirdly, why didn’t Hottix just license the iBeer application. Greedy Idiots!
  • Fourth, think of the consumers. I have the iPint application and it is fine. A little basic but ok. Certainly not worth $2.99. Not even worth $0.99. Why do people keep writing such shit iPhone apps and try to get people to pay for them. Take a look at Texas Hold ‘em by Apple. Now that is worth the money.
  • Fifth, logic is wrong. There is NO WAY I would have bought the iBeer OR iPint application if it cost anything, so there is very little cannibalisation there in my opinion. The only people who bought the iBeer did it because it was one of the earlier apps available and they were in a descovery phase. 
Shame on you Apple for taking iPint down. I would have told Hottix to get a life, suck it up and actually produce someting of real value, not cry when someone puts a realistic price on their gimicky overpriced crap!

Facebook Shmacebook

I just read a cool piece of research from Ogilvy comparing Facebook and other social networking sites in Asia.

The key thing was that Facebook is not number 1 in most Asian markets. The reasons for this (in short, but I suggest you go read the research HERE, which is also quite succinct) are:

  • Language: Friendster is killing Facebook in Malaysia and Indonesia. Largely because Friendster has Malay / Bahasa Indonesia (which are pretty much the same language – and a beautiful one, I encourage anyone to learn it. Its not too hard. There are no tenses and often to pluralize a noun you just say it twice! :)
  • Customization: Philippines accounts for almost 40% of all Friendster traffic. Filipinas send more SMSs than anyone in the world (SMS started off free there and is still pretty cheap), and Friendster has a good mobile site and good SMS link ups which most importantly, Friendster tailored to them specifically to that market… clever old Friendster (crap name though)
  • Site weight & Broadband usage: India (Orkut) with low broadband means that Facebook is too heavy so they use the lighter Orkut. I am not sure I buy this.
  • Inferiority: Japan (Mixi) and Korea (Cyworld) are examples. Each of their mobile sites blow Facebook’s out of the water (and Facebook’s mobile site and iPhone App are excellent in my opinion). Plus Japanese and Korean are just different. You can’t rope them in with the rest of Asia.

I grew up in a few places, and travelled a lot. I agree with my man in Singapore most of the reasons, but one of the main reasons is that you join what your friends join, and sometimes if one site takes off, then that one tips over the tipping point and wins and not the other one. I reckon Orkut just took off. You don’t want to be sitting alone at Susan Facebook’s party when everyone else is getting down with Deepak Orkut!

And now a question: Why is Philippines spelt with a PH, and Filipino spelt with an F?  Someone call someone.

Digtial agencies outsourcing digital… huh?

Most if not all traditional Agencies outsource their tech, which everyone seems comfortable with. But more and more, digital agencies (and in particular digital agencies spawned from traditional advertsing agencies) are outsourcing their tech. The article which you can read here says that this is a good thing and I do agree with many of their points. For some development. Mobile for example can’t be done by traditional digital agencies and has to be outsourced.

But to be honest I would steer clear of any digital agency that outsources all or most of their digital production. What you have in this case is a consultant. Which is fine if the company is transparent about who they are and who is actually doing the work and supporting the devlopment post implementation.

At my work, Oliver Palmer, the co founder and Head of Innovation has been to India, and assessed options there, as well as Asia. From what I know Eastern Europe has great tech; but for what we do, keeping creative development an innovation in Australia is essential and not going to change anytime soon. 

Your tech guys need to be able to speak to the client or agency tech guys (through a controlled account and technical managment process of course :) . If you, as a client, are shielded from the source of the development then things just go wrong. Its like chatting up a girl through your friend and her friend. Things get mis-interpreted and you end up turning up at a wedding reception in full S&M gear expecting an orgy.

Not that I would know anything about what ‘full S&M gear’ actually is of course… um… now I sound prude! Do using the words “full S&M gear” make me sound sound prudish and inexperienced? I am sure they have a word for each element of S&M gear that I am unaware of. That ball thing for in your mouth that Marsellus Wallace wears at ‘Z’s friend’s place, what is that?…. Anyone?….. Beuller? (I did look it up on the deviants dictionary, but it wasn’t there. Oh well… at least I know what altocalciphilia is, and I am pleased to say I have it!)

Eating my words about QR codes

Sometimes I have to eat my words. I know I am often down on QR codes, but here is why they will be succesful outside of Japan one day. Courtesy of the Sun newspaper. The worst part is that I don’t even know what she has in her hands!… I couldn’t do the 4 steps it takes to find out!

Are VC Funded Companies Good For Mobile?

A couple of times in New York, we have submitted a solid realistic proposal only to lose out to a company who offered a similar service for cheap or for free (which is fine, I am not unhappy about it, with digital growing there are plenty of clients to keep us busy). But I thought that I would write about it because while it may save some money in the short term, I was wondering if it is doing the client any favours in the medium to long term.

Ways they are helping clients

Especially in the mobile advertising market, VC funding has helped establish, grow and bed down their technology. We have seen the success of this with companies such as Quattro, Ringleader, Millenial and AdMob. None of these companies would have been able to scale up as successfully unfunded.

You can see why this has worked if you compare the USA to say Australia, where a less developed and more risk averse VC market has meant that they have fallen behind in this area. Ditto to an extent in Europe, although there are some good companies there, although not as many as in the USA.

I am all for the VC industry, in fact I think that they are the cornerstone of innovation and a growing digital economy. But raise money for the right reason. The right reason is to build and grow a sustainable profitable business where it isn’t possible to do it organically.

Ways that they aren’t

The first example is more common in earlier stage VC funded companies. The ones where a senior executive from a large multinational leaves to join a start up “because he is passionate about start-ups / high performing nimble teams, etc… (read: passionate about the payoff)”. These companies will often strike deals at a discount to get some clients and could also do a deal which allowed them to exploit some content on mobile in some other way (like the South Park underpants gnomes did)

The problem with this is that their executive teams are still over paid; largely due to no one accepting low salaries due to the funding available. Factor in the best tech guys that money can buy and your salary bill is bigger than it should be. I should mention that some of them are worth it (especially good tech guys). But many aren’t; their appointment more to do with facilitating a second round of funding rather than good company fundamentals, and insightful effective strategy.

In the current climate (with no IPOs happening and debt financing impossible), when the VC money runs out they are going bust because they can’t pay their salary bill. So the poisoned chalice for clients is that on the one hand they often get some good work done for quite cheap (as the tech guys in these companies are often good), but as I have seen a few times recently the company goes bust leaving the client wondering what to do next.

The second thing that isn’t helping is that companies are offering builds for free or for a large discount in exchange for an exclusive 2 year+ deal selling mobile advertising on it (the case with many publishers). I don’t have an issue with this model, in fact we have offered similar ones (you end up making your money back plus more on media sales commissions). The problem isn’t as much for the supplier as for the publisher. Do you really want to lose that big a chunk of your ad revenue (the commissions) for that long?

Ultimately long term these deals can’t work out for the supplier either, as the publisher quite understandably ditches the supplier and gets his own in house ad sales teams to do it. But for the VC funded supplier that doesn’t really matter, as the exit is usually 2 to 5 years (plenty of time to make short term money while making your numbers look good), so the focus is on how rich the executives will make themselves, rather than the long term future of the company.

The solution

The solution to this is realistically priced solutions from companies with good fundamentals that partner with clients for the long term. Don’t get me wrong, VC funded companies do do this, and there is nothing wrong with VC or any other funding, but it really needs to be used for building and growing a profitable business with good fundamentals…. and not for collecting underpants.