Luke Janssen

Jumping off stuff

Archive for The Future

Magazine iPhone apps

Magazines!… grow some balls and charge for your iPhone and Blackberry apps. I hear so much whining about ‘oh the BBC is stealing all my eyeballs‘ or ‘boo-hoo the advertising revenues are down‘, well here is your chance to make some subscription revenue and you are squandering it!

iPhone 3.0 can handle subscriptions….  nice ongoing subscription revenue. Even $1 a month would help. I read the telegraph every day on iPhone and I would gladly pay that, and people will gladly pay as long as that becomes the norm. But they won’ t pay if people like Business week are pulling their pants down and destroying the model early.

Business week bringing out a free iPhone app is the WRONG approach. You don’t give away business week for free at the newsstands do you? I hear alot of back pedaling by publishers lead my Murdoch who is now trying to charge for on-line content when it was free before. This is the right idea, but its like closing the gate (10 years) after the horse has bolted.

Now we have a new horse and are thinking of putting him in a pen with no gate again!… why?.  Magazines have a price, and also advertising revenues. Why change the business model just because the medium changes? Sure you don’t have printing costs, but you still have to pay journalists, who are being laid off faster than something very fast that I can’t think of right now.. And it doesn’t seem bad now, but believe me, we don’t want to wake up in 10 years to find out that we live in a world where journalists have been replaced by bedroom bloggers and Twitter!

So like I said – grow some balls, and charge for your valuable content (unless you think it isn’t valuable) AND get advertising revenue too – just like you do for the actual magazine. You never know you might actually make some money!… and as a bonus, you could save journalism too!

Apple – 3 main predictions (and what sells phones)

Ok since it isn’t out yet, here are my three main predictions for what Apple will do, since everyone seems to be making predictions one of these will be announced at WWDC, and the others over the coming year:

iPod Nano phone

Cheap version maybe on Verizon / for Walmart. Also a Nano sized phone would look awesome and girls would love it. Especially if it is pink. Yep, that does sound sexist, but look what happened with the Pink Motorola V3. Unfortunately for the geeks, the fact is that design sells way more than features. There is a whole section of the market who don’t care about features at all as long as the phone looks cute, and feels nice in their pocket / handbag.

New iPhone 3G

Even though I firmly believe that features don’t sell phones, there will be a new iPhone 3G in response to the Palm Pre / others, with head to head competing features. The one area where a feature does sell is megapixels with cameras. Which is utterly ridiculous because all it means is that my mum sends me images that are way too big. With the age of sharing images on Facebook you don’t need or want high megapixels, and actually end turning on the ‘for web’ setting. Where Apple wins is usability. Usability trumps features.


Medium sized tablet

My Sony Vaio is excellent. You can’t travel with a PC that is bigger. But it is still too big. Often I use my iPhone (which I use alot, and haven’t made one call on it yet) instead, but it is still too small. So these two need to converge. And this is the Apple tablet, which will be less than half the size of my Vaio, and more than twice the size of my iPhone. Maybe an iPhone that you flip open with touch screens on both bits.

While I am at it, this is what sells handsets (in order)

  • Design (external design – does it look and feel pretty, and not seem to plasticky. Also important here is what is cool. What does Paris Hilton have?)
  • Usability (is it easy to use and not frustrating. In particular texting. For business users, this is important too, how to read, organise, search email easily. Better to have 3 features that are simple and usable, than 20 that are not usable)
  • Price (what can you afford on what plan – what is being offered free. All manufacturers will need a low priced entry level handset to grab market and then move them through the range later)
  • Features (the least important factor in my opinion. They have to have value and most importantly be easy to use. If I were in charge I would have as few features as you can get away with, but make them uber usable)

Nokia vs Apple

This blog entry is mainly about Nokia’s Ovi store. Loosely this is an App store like Apple’s, but it promises to be availble to 300m devices by 2012.

This is big. I am a big fan of apple, but iPhone sales are dwarfed by sales of Nokias. In my opinion Apple is still way ahead in terms of the phone design and useability, but Nokia (and everyone else with varying degrees of success) are all trying to copy; and as Motorola found out, you can’t just make one awesome phone (the V3) and then sit back and bask.

What does Ovi have?

  • A general app store that gives developers 70% of sales revenue (like Apple) accross 15 set price points, and charges though the carriers (after the carriers take their share (which is SHIT – carriers take 40% to 50% – there won’t be anything left!), or through credit card. Apple is way ahead in this respect, and Nokia will have to come up with some more solutions – things like Paypal will help, but one thing Nokia hasn’t got that Apple has is the billing relationship. And that matters. Alot.
  • Nokia music store does pretty much the same thing as iTunes, and also streams from your PC. It also has a recommendation engine which is good, but it isn’t as cool as Apple’s iTunes Genius (neither of which are as good as last.fm)
  • Nokia Friend view, which actually pits Nokia against Google (their new Lattitude service). I think that Google has a better chance, as their solution goes accross all platforms wheras Nokia’s is only availlable on S60 handsets at the moment. They both look cool though – check out the videos here.
  • MOSH which is Nokia’s UGC thing which I won’t go into here.
  • A games capability which Nokia will be ahead of Apple for; due to their experience with the N Gage. That said, Apple is more Wii (because of the accelarometer) and NGage is more Playstation, and I prefer Wii over Playstation. Steve Jobs doesn’t really like gaming either, so he may be missing a trick here. Games outsold DVDs this year. 

Distribution

  • iTunes has between 100m and 250m users depending on who you ask, iPhone has tens of millions
  • Nokia say that Ovi will be on 300m devices by 2012. This is bullish, but Nokia do have 40% of the global market, and there are more than 4bn connections out there (or thereabouts), and 40% of that is 1.6Bn!
  • Something else to remember is that iPhone users use their devices way more than Nokia users do – even the new Nokia devices… we will wait and see what Nokia produces to answer the iPhone. I haven’t seen anything close yet (from anyone – confirmed by our guys Nic and Simon who are at 3GSM  in Barcalona at the moment)

Can Nokia get it on the handsets?

All the new ones yes – the first one is the N97 in May, but they say that they will be able to get it on the Series 40 and 60. Through an ‘on handset’ application. Getting people to download that is by no means easy.

Also remember that Nokia will start to piss the carriers off as they will theorise that they will lose revenue (the credit card part). Who knows they may gain more (i.e. their share of the carrier charged downloads), but they will fight over it – which should be fun to watch!  The carriers need to invest in this stuff too otherwise they will become dumb pipes, which they need to either accept, or do something about. And it has to be something more impressive than Nokia and Apple, and Google can do. And that is a very tall order…

So will Nokia win?

Even considering that Nokia has just laid off a load of their R&D guys due to the recession (Not a good time to need to innovate and develop cool stuff) in summary: If Nokia can connect effectively with their handsets: i.e. all the lower end handsets download the application OR all new Nokias pre load Ovi AND they sort their billing out, AND the carriers don’t kill them, THEN they will have the biggest network in the world. Even if they do this – Apple will still be there, they won’t go away because they are too cool and they do things right and their design is beautiful.

But while Apple is “cooler” than Nokia. it isn’t by that much…. Finnish people never hurt anyone, so Maito on calistaSokeri on Halpa to you!

Do mini projectors mean the death of mobile sites?

In my last post I talked about mobile phones with projectors in them. This means that the small screen can become a big screen (then I saw this article about 3M designing miniature projectors today). So will this mean that all our business designing for the small screen and building mobile sites will dry up?

Well the answer is no. Even if ALL new phones have new projectors in them, it would take 18 to 24 months for those devices to get in people’s hands, so there will be 3 to 4 years before projectors become ubiquitous (god I HATE that word!). It took as long for cameras to get in all phones, which is pretty much is now; but remember the first one was on there 5 years ago.

More importantly, the nature of projectors is that you need to remain in one place (to project on to something), and the nature of mobile is that you engage alot of the the time, when you are on the move; and those two things don’t go together. 

What it does mean is that mobile TV and mobile movies become more viable. Imagine going to iTunes (or bit torrent – lets be honest) with your phone and downloading a movie, then watching it wherever you find a nice surface. And the good thing is that it will look cool (so as I said, the geeks and gadget lovers will love it).

Happy New Year

So what will happen in 2009 for mobile? (and some other stuff)

  • Companies will go bust. In my opinion these will be mainly venture funded companies without a viable business model whose venture capital backers refuse to give them more and they can’t raise it from elsewhere.  I reckon more than one of the mobile ad networks will go under. Banks are still reluctant to lend to small and medium sized businesses despite government handouts and pressure
  • Companies will get stronger. The good thing about downturns is a) it means you have to work harder and smarter, and people who don’t get axed (i.e. the company becomes leaner, as you separate out the high performers from the people who can’t cut it)), and b) because some companies will go bust, even a smaller market size with fewer players will lead to a larger market share for the surviving companies
  • Mobile internet will become a no brainer. i.e. everyone will have a mobile enabled website. Smart companies will design and build these appropriately rather than just squashing their on line content into mobile. Because of this, mobile advertising will settle down and actually start making some people some money (the remaining mobile ad serving networks once some have gone bust)
  • Mobile payments has to happen soon, but maybe 2009 is still too early for big adoption. I see someone like Visa / Mastercard winning this race, despite the lead being taken by start-up companies. Mind you Paypal didn’t do too badly against the big boys
  • MMS will become bigger in the USA as interconnect happens. But it won’t go massive
  • QR codes/Bluetooth/other peripheral mobile tech still won’t be mainstream enough for brands to seriously consider them for anything other than to get PR
  • iPhone will continue to grow and push the market. We haven’t seen any devices that are as good. Yet. Mind you mine runs out of batteries in less than a day! something must be up! 
  • I think that we will see the first phones sold with mini projectors in 2009. Allowing full screen web browsing from the phone. Which will stir things up conceptually, but will be in the hands of GEEKS! and will be mainstream (if at all) in 2 more years
  • Android may well become big, depending largely on whether Sony Ericsson / Motorola / others adopt it in new handsets… they have said they would…
  • Facebook will get stronger as will Google and Apple (well Duh!)…. carriers and handset manufacturers will get weaker. Carriers won’t exist as we know them in 10 years time.
  • Japanese toilets will become big in theUSAOk so that won’t happen… but it would be good if it did!
  • The USA should do something cool with tech as they have a newly appointed CTO type person. Countries should start to cover themselves in WIMAX soon, and even if they don’t, internet access from laptops will happen everywhere. If not through WIMAX then standard wireless, or 3G cards. In the later part of 2009 you won’t be able to buy a laptop without as a minimum, the option to connect wherever, whenever. And it will be free. Maybe not in 2009, but certainly by 2010
  • I hope they sort out international roaming charges. I am sick of having 3 SIM cards. The EU is legislating for this which is good news. But I can’t see it getting sorted in 2009. Carrier tech is actually way crapper than you think, it isn’t just the money men hoarding their pennies!
  • Because of Facebook and myspace’s sharing of content it will become less important for politicians to be squeaky clean. Doing the odd line of coke or dressing up as a girl or kissing a dude won’t ruin your political future (or it better not otherwise we will be out of politicians very soon – and to be honest I wouldn’t trust someone squeaky clean to run things anyway. Hitler was squeaky clean vegetarian, whereas Churchill was a drunk)…. so I will add a quote from Abraham Lincoln “those with very few vices tend to have very few virtues!.

Happy new year….

Death to patents!

Apple is being sued for patent infringement over the way its iPhone surfs the internet by EMG Technology, who alledged that the company infringes on a patent it holds for navigating the internet on mobile devices. The patent was issued little more than a month ago, but relies on 76 claims that were originally filed in 1999. The patent covers how online content is displayed on mobile devices after being reformatted from HTML to XML.

Wake up call to all the old way of doing things: Gen Y don’t give a shit about copyright, and China doesn’t give a shit about Patents (ergo: they will be worthless within 50 years, and a good thing too!).

In my opinon if someone comes up with an innovative new product, they should get off their ass and commercialise it and make money from it, then by the time everyone has copied them and they therefore make less (which is good for the consumer) they should be continually innovating to commercialise their next product. 

People like the Tetra pak moguls don’t deserve their millions. I can’t see any arguement that can be used to say that they do. Sure, make a few million, but end it there; let patents last a maximum of 3 years. These guys are essentially sitting on their arses making money without hard work or continual innovation. And that is wrong.

To all the Pharmaceutical companies who whine about “the cost of R&D needs to be protected” get over yourselves you make way too much money and you know it.

With regard to the Apple case, it seems like EMG renewed a bunch of patents with the specific purpose of suing. Why don’t they stop being babies and make money from it themselves, not wait for Apple to and then try to bring Apple down for succeeding where they failed!. By the way I am not an Apple-phile; they took us to court in Sydney when we trademarked “mPod”, (which we did before the iPod came out, but they took all “pods” to court) to be honest it was just their Lawyers using up their retainers and justifying their own existence and producing nothing. 

ok so I am sounding a little socialist (my grandad was in the Communist party when he was at Oxford!). And I am not saying lets redistribute the wealth, becoming rich is fine if you do it by working hard or innovating, or both. Not inventing one thing once, and then build a giant lazy-boy (reclining comfy chair) out of Patent protection lawyers.

Biometrics

HSBC sent me a customer feedback form asking about my experience with the bank. Satisfied, Unsatisfied… etc. but there was no box with “Incandescent with rage” next to it, so I decided not to fill it in. 

The problem is that even when I sign up for sites which do’t require heavy security I get nannied into having a password 6 characters long including letters and numbers. So in the end I either forget, or I make them all the same. The former is annoying, the latter makes security weaker.

What I did enjoy is joining a queue of 7 at the Iris scan at Heathrow rather than joining the queue of 107 at the other counter. Biometrics needs to happen accross all areas. Eyes, fingers, whatever, but somehting needs to be done, the need is clear, but I think that the infrastructure isn’t there yet. 

I think that mobiles will play a role here. PIns can easily be entered, and bluetooth or another RFID type solution shouldnt’ be too difficult to sort out. Any solution is 12 months away minimum, and the winner will be someone like Visa or Amex. It won’t be one of these mobile payments solutions companies that have sprung up in order to soak up VC money that’s for sure.

Mobile Implants

The mobile is becoming more of a device you look at than have at your ear these days. Those ear-pieces make you look like an idiot so we need to find a way of implanting our mobiles into ourselves while still looking a little bit cool (although you still look like a talking to yourself madman)

1st evolution

Implants will happen first as pieces of jewelry like attachments, an earring and a tooth crown or something. Motorola have been experimenting with mobiles in clothing for a years already… problem is you can’t wear the same Motorola jacket or sunglasses every day!

Voice recognition will make sure you don’t have to dial any numbers from your teeth.

2nd evolution

Soon mobiles will be implanted as organic computers. Scientists at Keio University in Japan have recently done a proof of concept (2007) by putting text onto a strain of bacteria DNA. The Israeli’s did something similar in 2004

Since talking is such an effort, why not use thought to controll your new computer. I have played a thought controlled game at an exhibition in Sydney… I felt just like Yoda!).

So anyway, look out for the telepathy brain plug in (in 5 to 20 years i’d say). The problem is that people with ‘voices in their head’ would think they had crossed lines.

And now for a relevant joke: Women could put the their mobile implants in their implants (this innovation should be ready today – chips and tits are both silicon after all), that way men could now listen to women’s breasts in addition to just talking to them :)

mobile projectors

Olly was on the train a while ago speaking to someone from Oxford University who was working on putting mini projectors into mobile phones. Which I thought is very cool; you can project whole websites or watch movies on a mini-big screen. Basically it does away with the limitation of handset screen size, which is in turn constrained by pocket / handbag / convenience size.

Mind you I traveled from New York to London yesterday and flew BA instead of Air India (it was air miles, that’s why!). Before I went to bed I watched two films. 1: “hitched” or something which is ok actually for a chick flick, and 2: “Iron man” which is perhaps a wait for the DVD. Anyway I digress. The point is that watching these two films, although means that I am falling asleep at my desk right now, was a pleasurable and easy experience. This despite the fact that BA screens (which are smaller than Air India by the way) were only really a little larger than an iPhone screen.

So my two recommendations are:

  1. Travel Air India between London and NY. You save quite alot on the ticket price and your Bollywood movie selection is massive!
  2. Don’t start changing what you are doing because of the projector mobile for another 6 months minimum…